RE: [sv-bc] Agenda: Feb 6 SV-BC Errata Committee Meeting

Matt,

They are telling me that 53904 is an invalid pass code.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:16 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Agenda: Feb 6 SV-BC Errata Committee Meeting
> 
> SV-BC Errata Committee Meeting
> Date: Monday, February 6, 2006
> Time: 09:00am-11:00am PST
> 
> Toll Free Dial In Number: (888)635-9997
> International Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: (763)315-6815
> PARTICIPANT CODE: 53904
> 
> Agenda
> 
> +Review IEEE patent policy
>   http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt
> 
> + Review Minutes of Previous Meeting
> 
>   http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_06_01_09.txt
> 
> + P1800 Committee Meeting Update
> 
> Per Karen (http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/3792.html) the P1800
> Committee
> has requested feedback from the sub-committees:
> 
> 1) Should 1364 & 1800 be merged?
> 2) If 1364 & 1800 should be merged, when should it be done?
> 3) Any other questions or comments to the study group as they
> consider
>    their decision to develop the next PAR.
> 
> Please come prepared to vote on 1 & 2.  As for 3, please send
> e-mail
> to the reflector prior to the meeting.  We will record
> additional
> feedback in the minutes.
> 
> + E-mail ballot review
> 
> An e-mail ballot was sent Jan 30th:
> 
> http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/3802.html
> 
> Review the results including any issues receiving 'no' votes
> 
> + Top-N Issues Appropriate for SV-BC
> 
>  Process:
>  Identify -=N=- issues to focus committee effort
>  Assign owners for the issues
>  Owners bring issues to vote when draft of proposal complete
>  Rebuttal to issues should come in the form of specific
>   changes to proposal
> 
>  Guidelines for issues:
>  - Group would prefer not to address issues that complicate
> merging of
> the
>    LRMs or require edits to both specs.  Group would prefer to
> address
> more
>    isolated errata until next PAR is set.
> 
>  - Try to clarify intent of some issues even if no formal
> resolution.
>    This would be useful for keeping implementations consistent.
> 
> 
>  Please identify issues that meet the above guidelines and send
> them to
> the
>  reflector so we can continue to make progress.
> 
> + Proposed Next Meeting Date: March 6th
> 
> Action Items
> 
> Completed
> 01/09/2006 Matt update SVDB 1278 that it should wait until
> merge of 1364
> & 1800
> 01/09/2006 Matt notify SV-EC/Mehdi that SVDB 1178 should be
> resolved by
> SV-EC
> 01/09/2006 Doug Update 631 in SVDB before vote.
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001297
> 01/09/2006 Doug transfer 624 to one of the associated SVDB
> issues (1004,
> 1072)
> and reference each issue to the other.
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001298
> 01/09/2006 Doug update proposal for 1253 to include a statement
> about
>            polarity_operator not affecting simulation behavior
> 01/09/2006 Doug to update proposal for 664 per friendly
> amendment
> 01/09/2006 Dave Add bug note to SVDB 704 that this was ETF 613
> 01/09/2006 Gord remove Bugnote for SVDB 1188
> 01/09/2006 Steven add wording to SVDB 1246 that identifies why
> this is
> not an
>            issue noting that the BNF allows only expressions as
> macro
>            argmuments.
> 
> 11/07/2005 Matt   Send email Vote for:
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=871
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=881
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=882
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=908
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=911
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=912
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=919
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=932
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=941
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=942
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=944
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=945
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=946
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=949
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=952
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=984
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1092
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1138
>   http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1159
> 
> Pending
> 
> 12/05/2005 Steven Ask Jay if issue 1127 is resolved in P1800?
> 01/09/2006 Shalom add example for issue 1254 describing
> situation for
> rule 3
> 01/09/2006 Matt assemble issue list for future work
> 01/09/2006 Matt find owners for future work issues