>-----Original Message----- >From: Stuart Sutherland [mailto:stuart@sutherland-hdl.com] >Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:43 AM >To: Bresticker, Shalom; Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org >Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th > > >Oops, my abstention and comments apply to item 1253, not 984. >I vote to approve 984, and abstain on 1253. > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >Stuart Sutherland >stuart@sutherland-hdl.com >+1-503-692-0898 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] >> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:28 AM >> To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org >> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th >> >> Stu, >> >> 984 has nothing to do with specify blocks, I think you mixed it up >> with a different one. >> >> The proposals for 1297 and 1298 are to close them. >> >> Shalom >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On >Behalf Of >> > Stuart Sutherland >> > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 6:01 PM >> > To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org >> > Subject: RE: [sv-bc] e-mail vote: closes Feb 5th >> > >> > >> > Stu's votes... >> > >> > > SVDB 871 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=871 >> > > >> > > SVDB 881 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=881 >> > > >> > > SVDB 882 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=882 >> > > >> > > SVDB 908 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=908 >> > > >> > > SVDB 911 ___Yes _X__No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=911 >> > Will change to YES with Cliff's proposed friendly >ammendment to the >> > wording. >> > > >> > > SVDB 912 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=912 >> > > >> > > SVDB 919 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=919 >> > > >> > > SVDB 932 __X_Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=932 >> > > >> > > SVDB 941 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=941 >> > > >> > > SVDB 942 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=942 >> > > >> > > SVDB 944 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=944 >> > > >> > > SVDB 945 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=945 >> > > >> > > SVDB 946 ___Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=946 >> > > >> > > SVDB 949 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=949 >> > Would like to also inlcude Cliff's friendly ammendment to fix line >> > wrap problem. >> > >> > > >> > > SVDB 952 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=952 >> > > >> > > SVDB 961 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=961 >> > > >> > > SVDB 962 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=962 >> > It would be helpful if the .htm file for the proposal showed a >> > strike-through of the old wording. >> > > >> > > SVDB 984 _X__Yes ___No _X_ Abstain >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=984 >> > The proposal sounds reasonable, but I would want to hear from >> > someone who is an expert on specify blocks to be sure the >change is >> > appropriate. >> > >> > > >> > > SVDB 1092 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1092 >> > > >> > > SVDB 1138 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1138 >> > > >> > > SVDB 1159 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1159 >> > > >> > > SVDB 1253 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1253 >> > > >> > > SVDB 1255 ___Yes _X__No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1255 >> > There is no specific proposal for editing changes. But I >agree that >> > all UDP I/O should be called "terminals", not "ports". >The the VPI >> > (and deprecated >> > ACC) use "terminal" to distinguish UDP I/O from module ports. >> > >> > > >> > > SVDB 1260 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1260 >> > > >> > > SVDB 1261 _X__Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1261 >> > > >> > > SVDB 1297 ___Yes _X__No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1297 >> > I did not see a specific proposal for editing changes. >> > >> > > >> > > SVDB 1298 ___Yes ___No >> > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1298 >> > I did not see a specific proposal for editing changes. >> > >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> > Stuart Sutherland >> > stuart@sutherland-hdl.com >> > +1-503-692-0898 >> > >> >Received on Mon Feb 6 08:55:11 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 06 2006 - 08:55:39 PST