Right; my option 1 would require that only in the case where the lone identifier was a visible type. We could simply always require formals to be named. Since SV allows name association, it may make sense to go that route (similar to the issue of whether a virtual override matches if the names differ). Gord. Steven Sharp wrote: > Requiring that prototypes explicitly name the formals would also avoid > the problem. > > Steven Sharp > sharp@cadence.com > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.comReceived on Tue Nov 15 06:50:03 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 15 2005 - 06:52:40 PST