Re: [sv-bc] Is an unnamed block with declarations a scope?

Gord wrote:
>Well, given the input so far, I am certainly prepared to
>adopt (2) as my authoritative interpretation as it is the
>simplest rule that preserves 1364 compatibility.  It would
>be convenient if everyone had the same interpretation until
>this can be clarified in some future rev in order to avoid
>interpretation wars over relatively simple issues like this.

I believe that is what we are doing in our simulator.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com