Re: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-bc] potential command line option

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 22:33:32 PDT
Steve Meyer wrote:
>  I thought we had already agreed to this.  Cver follows XL and does
>not allow configs in source files.  Allowing configs in source files
>(made even worse if `defines are allowed) is not algorithmically correct
>in the sense that circularities occur.

Steve,

Can you provide more details about such problems?  The only thing I
can think of is the issue of how to figure out the top-level modules
or config in the traditional one-pass use-model where the tool is
expected to figure this out for itself.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
Received on Mon Apr 25 22:33:47 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 25 2005 - 22:34:07 PDT