>From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com> >Isn't this a 1364 issue? The requirement on initializers came from 1800. In 1364 we could require always blocks to run before initial blocks (which includes initializers). This definitely seems like an issue in 1364. I don't know whether it is appropriate to change the behavior of initializers in 1364, but I guess we could. I also don't know whether changes can be made to 1364 based on a ballot comment on 1800. Technically they are still separate standards, being balloted independently, right? Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Tue Apr 12 17:47:33 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:48:03 PDT