RE: [sv-bc] DataTypes: friendly overview

From: Kathy McKinley <mckinley@cadence.com>
Date: Fri Nov 12 2004 - 10:54:25 PST

Actually, Stu's paragraph made it into the overview. We also added
a few more examples. Unfortunately, the very last one is wrong because
the enumeration is two-state, which would not be allowed in this first
revision.

>Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:46:51 -0500 (EST)
>From: Steven Sharp <sharp>
>Subject: RE: [sv-bc] DataTypes: friendly overview
>To: mckinley, btf-dtype@boyd.com, sv-bc@eda.org, stuart@sutherland-hdl.com

>As Stu points out, it is a good idea to make clear that the proposal is
>backward compatible with existing Verilog. We all know that was a goal
>and the rules were designed to meet it. But someone who was just looking
>at the resulting rules might have trouble reconstructing that.
>
>Since it is a little late to put that into the overview, I guess we just
>have to deal with it when it comes up.
Received on Fri Nov 12 10:54:30 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 12 2004 - 10:54:34 PST