Subject: RE: [sv-bc] proposal for nested modules and interfaces
From: Kevin Cameron (sv-xx@grfx.com)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 09:28:05 PST
Why would you want to implicitly instantiate a nested module
anyway?
Kev.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Jonathan Bromley wrote:
> > _Nested modules with no ports that are not explicitly
> > instantiated shall be implicitly instantiated once.
> > Otherwise, if not explicitly
> > instantiated, they are ignored._
>
> As part of the ongoing effort to avoid confusion, may I
> please beg for the following alternative...
>
> A nested module that is not explicitly instantiated shall be
> implicitly instantiated once, if and only if it has no ports.
>
> Forgive me if I'm wrong, but don't we also need to stipulate
> that the implicit instance has an instance name that's the
> same as its module name?
> --
> Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
> Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK
> Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
> Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com
>
> The contents of this message may contain personal views which
> are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 09:28:52 PST