Subject: [sv-bc] SV-BC issues to be closed
From: Dave Rich (David.Rich@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 09:10:38 PST
SV-BC-96 is a duplicate of SV-BC-49 and SV-BC-53, both of which have passed
SV-BC-97 already covered in 1364-2001 sec 12.4
SV-BC-111,SV-BC-136 are covered by SV-BC-53
SV-BC-112 I think the questions were answered in the e-mail discussion
SC-BC-116 No longer relevant because of SV-BC-103, enum labels no longer
are used to specify the type of the enum
SV-BC-118 I think the questions were answered in the e-mail discussion
-- -- David.Rich@Synopsys.com Technical Marketing Consultant http://www.SystemVerilog.org tele: 650-584-4026 cell: 510-589-2625
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 09:11:24 PST