RE: [sv-bc] LRM-46


Subject: RE: [sv-bc] LRM-46
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 09:35:59 PDT


Hello Dan,

Thank you for the response. I will go ahead and mark the item closed and
remove the Editor's note.

Regards
David

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jacobi,
Dan
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 11:07 PM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] LRM-46

I looked at the possibility to merge the dpi_function_proto production with
the named_function_proto production.

Even though the dpi_function_proto production includes the
named_function_proto I do not recommend to merge these production due to the
fact the dpi_proto_formal is not the function_proto_formal. The main
difference is that the function prototype formal argument includes
directions (or ref) descriptor.

Note the merging can be done (by changing the BNF) but I just don't
recommend it

Dan Jacobi
Tel : (972)-4-8655855
INet : 465-5855



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Apr 11 2003 - 09:33:45 PDT