[sv-ec] RE: Example cross select expression with multiple "with-matches" clauses

I agree with Scott. "integer_expression" seems clearly to be an error and is not further expanded in the LRM draft that I have. Is there a process issue with fixing it now? If so, I guess that we just need to put in a Mantis for it.

J.H.

-----Original Message-----
From: Little, Scott [mailto:scott.little@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 9:16 AM
To: Brad Pierce; sv-ec@eda.org
Cc: John Havlicek
Subject: RE: Example cross select expression with multiple "with-matches" clauses

Hi Brad,

Is there a reason that integer_expression persists? The original intention of the proposal was to only have one BNF item, integer_covergroup_expression. Can it be changed to integer_covergroup_expression?

Thanks,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 3:36 PM
To: sv-ec@eda.org
Cc: John Havlicek
Subject: [sv-ec] RE: Example cross select expression with multiple "with-matches" clauses

Hi John,

I integrated your example and explanation into the discussion part of the next version of the proposal.

See pages 3-4 in

  http://www.eda.org/svdb/file_download.php?file_id=5837&type=bug

-- Brad
Received on Wed Jul 11 07:22:57 2012