{Disarmed} RE: [sv-ec] RE: Proposal for Mantis 2506 v17

And in order to end with something really trivial: in the first example of 19.6.1.4, 'endgroup' should be bold.

It is not clear to me that all these extensions to the coverage functionality are the ones that will make it more useful, but I will assume that you had good reasons for choosing these and not others.

Anyway, I finally finished my review, so no more comments, hopefully.

Regards,
Shalom

From: Scott Little [mailto:scott.little@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 4:59 PM
To: Bresticker, Shalom
Cc: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] RE: Proposal for Mantis 2506 v17

Apologies. Updated although still v18.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com<mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com>> wrote:
This still needs to be corrected:

In 19.6.1.4<http://19.6.1.4>: "However, for cross bins the type of the queue shall be the cross's CrossQueueType, whose elements are of type CrossValType (see Sec 19.6.1.2)," should be 19.6.1.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.