[sv-ec] Re: Updated version of 2506 (v16)

From: Scott Little <scott.little@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Dec 04 2011 - 09:29:11 PST

Hi Shalom,

See [SL] below. I have uploaded a new version.

Thanks,
Scott

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Bresticker, Shalom <
shalom.bresticker@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi, Scott.****
>
> ** **
>
> *In response to note 12505:*****
>
> ** **
>
> 2. I have moved all of the text in question regarding the default
> specification for both bins and transitions up into the general information
> section (19.5) and removed it from 19.5.1. I did not find any additional
> text that needed to be moved or duplicated.****
>
> ** **
>
> [SB] The current LRM has this sentence:****
>
> ** **
>
> "The *default sequence *form can be used to catch all transitions (or
> sequences) that do not lie within any of the defined transition bins (see
> 19.5.1)."****
>
> ** **
>
> When you moved it, the cross-reference was deleted. Was that deliberate?
> It would now be 19.5.2.****
>
> **
>

[SL] Not deliberate. I added it back.

> **
>
> Also, in this sentence, ****
>
> ** **
>
> "A *default *or *default sequence *bin specification cannot be explicitly
> ignored (see 19.5.4)."****
>
> * *
>
> the cross reference would now be to 19.5.5. It might be good to add a note
> to the editor that the cross references are already after the subclause
> renumbering due to the addition of a new 19.5.1. ****
>
> * *
>

[SL] I change the reference and added a note at the beginning of the mantis
that clarifies what should be done with the section numbering.

> **
>
> ** **
>
> *In response to note 12536: *****
>
> ** **
>
> 2. I added set_coverpoint_expression to the list of items to which b can
> apply. I don't believe it is necessary to add coverpoint_identifier.****
>
> ** **
>
> [SB] OK. I think set_coverpoint_expression would also be applicable in the
> following dashed item:****
>
> ** **
>
> — If an element of a *bins **covergroupopen_range_list *is a singleton
> value b, the element shall not participate in the bins values.
>

[SL] Added.

> All the other changes seem OK. I have not finished reviewing the changes
> to cross coverage, but I don’t have any other comments at this time.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks a lot,****
>
> Shalom****
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Dec 4 09:29:51 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 04 2011 - 09:29:58 PST