The current version of 3001 looks ok to me.
Shalom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Bromley
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 1:32 PM
> To: neil.korpusik@oracle.com; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ec] Resolution of 3001
>
> hi Neil
>
> Thanks for updating 3001 to "resolved/fixed".
>
> However, I'm not sure your comment in the note is correct. I removed
> two instances of "clause" as Shalom kindly suggested, but the one
> remaining instance is, I believe, appropriate - it points the reader to
> other examples of "new" elsewhere in clause 8, which is indeed the
> intended meaning.
>
> Aplologies if I got the wrong end of the stick here. In any case, I'm
> sure the Editor can sort it out easily :-)
>
> Thanks
> Jonathan Bromley
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Oct 27 10:57:17 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 27 2011 - 10:57:21 PDT