[sv-ec] Soft constraint misunderstanding

To Arturo and others:

as you correctly said, I did indeed get my wires crossed about the
behaviour of IEEE1647 keep-soft-select constraints. They do indeed
reset lower priority constraints, and therefore match the behaviour
proposed in Mantis 2987 for soft-dist.

Apologies for the distraction. It's not necessarily ideal from a user
point of view but it matches other behaviours and I withdraw my
objection to it.

Jonathan

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.