RE: [sv-ec] Multiple inheritance

Attached to http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1356

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad
> Pierce
> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 1:02 PM
> To: SV_EC List
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Multiple inheritance
>
> Dave,
>
> > I'll post the paper as soon as the conference is over.
>
> I'm eager to read it.
> http://www.dvcon.org/events/eventdetails.aspx?id=108-2 When it's
> available, please send us a link.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Brad
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich,
> Dave
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:00 AM
> Cc: SV_EC List
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Multiple inheritance
>
> This "tweet" was in response to a paper I presented at DVCon on multiple
> inheritance. My proposal was to have the functionality of Java interfaces
> using C++ syntax and limited semantics of virtual inheritance. (The
> interface keyword is already in use for a different purpose). I'll post
> the paper as soon as the conference is over.
>
> Dave
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> David
> > Jones
> > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:20 AM
> > To: Brad Pierce
> > Cc: SV_EC List
> > Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Multiple inheritance
> >
> > Is the request for true multiple inheritance (C++ style) or for
> > something similar to Java interfaces?
> >
> > The functionality of Java interfaces is relatively easy to define. But
> > if we try to define the equivalent of C++ multiple inheritance
> > (including multiple virtual inheritance) then the definition and
> > implementation get a lot more complex.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
> > wrote:
> > > According to Scott Roland, writing from DVCon, "Multiple inheritance
> is
> > the #1 SystemVerilog feature request for people with an OO background."
> > >
> > >    http://twitter.com/scott_roland/statuses/9584083182
> > >
> > > -- Brad
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.