Re: [sv-ec] Provide your SV-EC prioritized list for next LRM (PAR) [Due: Feb 3. 2010]

Hi Mehdi,
  Sorry if these are too late inputs. I hope some of them will get covered
in the next PAR. Will be glad to provide more details if needed.

Thanks
Srini
www.cvcblr.com

1. DPI - class argument passing, am OK with some reasonable restrictions,
but not having it limits practical usage a lot IMHO.
2. Ability of "deep_copy, deep_compare" from E/Vera (object_copy..)
3. FCOV: cross-of-cross, hierarchical cross (Like in VCS extensions)
4. AOP - my TOP priority REQUEST. Simply consider adding one additional
constraint to a SV env with factory vs. E's AOP style. I am fine with any
other extnsion that would address this most commonly used application -
Verification engineers need to add additional constraints without touching
the env-code with ease - not by complex macros, factories, rather much
simpler syntax please.

5. Variable part/bit select - heard it from few customers on this need, Also
E has this, FWIW.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Ajeetha Kumari <ajeetha@gmail.com> wrote:

> Feb 3rd deadline
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mehdi Mohtashemi <Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com>
> Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:03 AM
> Subject: [sv-ec] Provide your SV-EC prioritized list for next LRM (PAR)
> [Due: Feb 3. 2010]
> To: "sv-ec@eda.org" <sv-ec@eda.org>
>
>
> Many of you may have seen correspondence from p1800-WG,
> http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ieee1800/hm/0956.html [sent by Neil]
> and other sub-comittees, such as sv-bc requesting members to
> provide their inputs.
> [I am using the template sent by Brad in his email to sv-bc].
> For the PAR for next LRM standard work, Neil and I are gathering
> requirements from members. The PAR will be discussed
> at next p1800WG meeting. We will present the prioritized list to the
> group.
>
> You can refer to the database Mantis items for SV-EC:
> http://tinyurl.com/ybylbso
> and use this for your reference. Note that the sv-ec items are
> generally targetted for the testbench/verification subset.
>
> There are many subscribers to the sv-ec email alias, so I would expect
> members will pay attention and provide their inputs for our next step.
>
> Please use the following as the guideline:
> - Send your inputs by end of Feb 3 2010.
> - Include the mantis item(s) and rank them. Provide us with a prioritized
> list.
> - If there is an issue that is not part of mantis database, add it to the
> system under sv-ec, or send it to us we can add it.
> - Provide a meaningful background and reason for the requested enhancement.
>
> Please send us your inputs. thanks,
> Mehdi
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ajeetha Kumari
> * A Pragmatic Approach to VMM Adoption
> * SystemVerilog Assertions Handbook
> * Using PSL/SUGAR
> CEO & MD,
> Contemporary Verification Consultants Private Limited,
> Bangalore, India, http://www.cvcblr.com
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.