[sv-ec] RE: new Mantis filed

From: David Scott <David.Scott@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon Feb 01 2010 - 15:20:33 PST

Swapnajit,

My inclination would be to leave it up to the vendor. While it's true there are some warnings mandated by the LRM, I think we should avoid that whenever we can.

David

From: Swapnajit Chakraborti [mailto:swapnaj@cadence.com]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 5:15 AM
To: David Scott; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: RE: new Mantis filed

Do you think generating a warning would be relevant in this case?
We anyway have a section (19.5.6) listing possible warning situations.

Regds,
Swapnajit

________________________________
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of David Scott
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 4:11 AM
To: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] new Mantis filed
0002954: covergroup clause is unclear on degenerate open value ranges

http://www.eda.org/mantis/view.php?id=2954

David

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Feb 1 15:20:51 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 01 2010 - 15:21:03 PST