With apologies.... > the conclusion surely must be that no object created using shallow-copy > can ever have an embedded covergroup instance! > > Is this > (a) a correct interpretation of the LRM, > If I had had the right spectacles on I would have seen the Note clearly pointing out that this is the case. > (b) desirable? > Maybe still worth asking. Apologies again for the disturbance. -- Jonathan Bromley -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Dec 16 09:42:53 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 16 2009 - 09:43:10 PST