Hi All, I have a query regarding naming for coverpoints when covergroups have arguments. Consider the following definition of a covergroup: covergroup cg(ref logic [23:0] f1) @(posedge clk); coverpoint f1 { bins b1[] = {[0:20]}; } endgroup As per section 19.5 of draft 9 of SysV LRM "If the label is omitted and the coverage point is associated with a single variable, then the variable name becomes the name of the coverage point." This is shown in one example as well. But here this causes conflict as we will have a coverpoint with the name "f1" as well as an reference parameter with the same name "f1". Now both these symbols having same name "f1" exist in the same scope i.e. covergroup scope. Isn't this ambiguous? Thanks Saurabh -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 26 02:39:48 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 26 2009 - 02:41:54 PDT