>From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com> >I believe that a fork/join_none+any would fall under the list: "The >results of the following activities that can be initiated by a task are >not specified if the task is disabled". However, it is not specified in that list. Before the LRMs were merged, that list was in the Verilog LRM. It would only apply to Verilog constructs, not SV constructs. The SV LRM did not specify how disables affected any of the new constructs, so it was not defined whether any SV constructs would also fall under that list. But now that the LRMs are merged, a reader would assume that the list is a full list for SV constructs as well. It appears to say that no SV constructs fall under that list, even though no decision was ever made to that effect. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jul 7 21:02:41 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 07 2009 - 21:03:31 PDT