RE: [sv-ec] RE: List of Mantis item for Monday June 29th Champions Meeting

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Sun Jun 21 2009 - 11:15:22 PDT
Jonathan,

> 6.22.2 clearly defines type equivalence of associative arrays, 
> and this leads in turn to a clear definition of their 
> assignment compatibility.

Where does it say that assignment compability of associative arrays is defined by their type equivalence?

Even for other array types, assignment compatiblity does not require that the array types be equivalent, only that their element types be equivalent.

And even that statement in the Mantis 2380 proposal as currently worded does not talk about associative arrays.

That is exactly the problem.

Regards,
Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Jun 21 11:16:40 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 21 2009 - 11:16:48 PDT