RE: [sv-ec] Status update for sv-ec ballot comments

Hi,

Yes, ballot ID 56 refers to Mantis 2380. (It was my comment.) It started in SV-BC because the issue affects fixed-sized arrays as well as variable-size arrays.

Ballot ID 64 was handled by Mantis 2598.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 4:32 AM
> To: SV_EC List
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Status update for sv-ec ballot comments
> 
> 
> Neil,
> 
> 19 is strongly related to 
> http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2632 .
> 
> 81 is SV-AC http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=2717 .
> 
> 121 could be directly resolved by the editor, because the 
> text immediately following the problematic line makes clear 
> that a constant_expression is indeed required, as specified in A.2.11.
> 
> 
> For ballot comment 56, I think it's safe to assume that it 
> was just calling out Mantis 2380.
> 
>    "LRM is contradictory on whether unpacked array assignment 
> requires element type equivalence or assignment compatiblity. 
> See Mantis 2380."
> 
>    (BTW on May 11, 2009, SV-BC moved 2380 to SV-EC, mentioned in
> 
>     http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ec/hm/6799.html
>     http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_09_05_11.txt )
> 
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Neil Korpusik
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 5:39 PM
> To: SV_EC List
> Subject: [sv-ec] Status update for sv-ec ballot comments
> 
> I have been going through all of the 1800-2009 ballot 
> feedback that was
> assigned to the sv-ec to make sure that everything was being tracked.
> Mantis 2736 has been updated with all of the mantis items 
> that remained in
> the sv-ec for ballot comments. Everything that was approved 
> by the svec
> has been moved to the resolved state.
> 
> Attached is a list of all of the ballot comments that were 
> processed by
> the sv-ec.
> 
> As a result of this exercise I ended up with a couple of questions:
> 
> 1. Mantis 2380
> 
>     Is the intent for it to also cover ballot id 56?
>     Ballot id 56 was originally assigned to the sv-bc.
> 
> 2. Mantis 2575
> 
>     Is the intent for it to also cover ballot id 64?
> 
> I ran out of time for today, but it looks like we need to 
> create 4 more
> mantis items for ballot id: 19, 53, 81, 121. I was unable to 
> locate mantis
> items for those.
> 
> 
> Neil
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.