I have uploaded a new proposal for 2358 using this wording. -----Original Message----- From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:28 PM To: sharp@cadence.com; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; Arturo.Salz@synopsys.COM; shalom.bresticker@intel.com Cc: Dave_Rich@mentor.com; Mark.Hartoog@synopsys.COM; sv-ec@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ec] RE: Mantis 2358 - isssue 168 >Again, it is not inaccurate because it does not say "only", but I'll reword anyway: > >"If the arguments are specified at the time the class is extended, the subclass constructor shall not contain a super.new call. The compiler shall insert a call to super.new automatically, as whenever the sublcass constructor does not contain a super.new call (see 8.14)". > >Better? I think so. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon May 4 09:08:00 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 04 2009 - 09:08:46 PDT