RE: [sv-ec] RE: Mantis 2358 - isssue 168

From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog_at_.....>
Date: Mon May 04 2009 - 09:07:12 PDT
I have uploaded a new proposal for 2358 using this wording.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:28 PM
To: sharp@cadence.com; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; Arturo.Salz@synopsys.COM; shalom.bresticker@intel.com
Cc: Dave_Rich@mentor.com; Mark.Hartoog@synopsys.COM; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] RE: Mantis 2358 - isssue 168


>Again, it is not inaccurate because it does not say "only", but I'll reword
anyway:
>
>"If the arguments are specified at the time the class is extended, the subclass
constructor shall not contain a super.new call. The compiler shall insert a call
to super.new automatically, as whenever the sublcass constructor does not
contain a super.new call (see 8.14)".
>
>Better?

I think so.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon May 4 09:08:00 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 04 2009 - 09:08:46 PDT