Re: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 11:00am PDT Friday May 1 2009

I was waiting for Mantis to come back up so that I could
finish this up today, but it looks like that isn't going
to happen. This is as far as I got last night.


id 48  allow for future enhancement __X__ YES   _____ No
id 54  allow for future enhancement __X__ YES   _____ No
id 16, 17
    sv-ec agrees with sv-cc resolution to keep these regions for future use.
    Reject svdb 2632 statement.      __X__ YES   _____ No
id 19  No action required           __X__ YES   _____ No
id 20  svdb 2634  (svbc issue) sv-ec votes to accept the proposal as well.
                                     __X__ YES   _____ No
id 105 (id 110 is duplicate of 105)
    No action required               __X__ YES   _____ No
id 115  No action required          __X__ YES   _____ No
id 35   svdb 2705                   _____ YES   _____ No
id 36,37,38,39,40 svdb 2700         _____ YES   _____ No
id 41,    svdb 2681                 _____ YES   _____ No [svbc, svec will vote]
id 42,    svdb 2682                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 43,45  svdb 2430                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 44,    svdb 2701                 _____ YES   _____ No [svbc, svec will vote]
id 46,    svdb 2706                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 47,    svdb 2713                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 57,    svdb 2698                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 65,    svdb 2723                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 67,    svdb 2358                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 80,    svdb 2596                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 102,   svdb 2718                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 106,   svdb 2710                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 107,   svdb 2711                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 181,   svdb 2514                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 182,   svdb 2514                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 183,   svdb 2510                 _____ YES   _____ No
id 184,   svdb 2473                 __X__ YES   _____ No
   CLOSE 2473,  no further action required
   Draft8 says
   An associative array type or class shall be illegal as a
   destination type. So this has already been made illegal.
id 185, svdb 2342                   _____ YES   _____ No
id 186, svdb 2288                   _____ YES   _____ No
id 192, svdb 1256                   _____ YES   _____ No
svdb 2719 for the following  ids
                             id  58  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id  60  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id  61  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 104  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 108  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 112  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 117  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 118  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 119  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 122  _____ YES   _____ No
                             id 137  _____ YES   _____ No



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.