RE: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 11:00am PDT Friday May 1 2009

I was not able to complete my voting because the Mantis server was taken
down "for maintenance" in the middle of my going through the proposals.
Please consider any items with no vote indication as an abstain.

 

Stu

 

 

id 48  allow for future enhancement

      __X__ YES   _____ No

 

id 54  allow for future enhancement

      __X__ YES   _____ No

 

id 16, 17

   sv-ec agrees with sv-cc resolution to keep these regions for future use. 

   Reject svdb 2632 statement. 

   __X__ YES   _____ No

 

id 19  No action required

    __X__ YES   _____ No

 

id 20    svdb 2634  (svbc issue)

    sv-ec votes as well to accept the proposal as well.

   __X__ YES   _____ No 

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2634  

 

id 105 (id 110 is duplicate of 105)

     No action required

    __X__ YES   _____ No

 

id 115  No action required

    __X__ YES   _____ No

 

 

id 35, svdb 2705    __X__ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2705 

 

 

ids 36,37,38,39,40

svdb 2700    __X_ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2700  

 

I am voting yes, but wonder if two friendly amendments are needed.  For the
equality operator, the proposed new text states:

 

     "If both operands are string literals, the operator is the same
equality operator as for integer types"

 

Should "integer types" be "integral types"?

 

The same question applies to the matching text for the comparison operators.
.

 

 

id 41, svdb 2681    __X__ YES   _____ No

[both svbc and svec will vote on this]

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2681  

 

 

id 42, svdb 2682    __X__ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2682 

 

 

id 43 and id 45, 

svdb 2430    __X__ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2430   

 

 

id 44, svdb 2701    __X__ YES   _____ No

[both svbc and svec will vote on this]

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2701  

 

 

id 46, svdb 2706    __X__ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2706 

 

id 47, svdb 2713    _____ YES   __X__ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2713  

 

The "see text" that is added by the proposal is not clear.  See what text,
where?  I will change my vote to Yes if "see text" is replaced with a cross
reference.

 

id 57, svdb 2698    __X__ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2698 

 

id 65, svdb 2723    __X__ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2723 

 

 

 

 

id 67, svdb 2358    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2358 

 

id 80, svdb 2596    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2596 

 

id 102, svdb 2718    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2718 

 

id 106, svdb 2710    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2710 

 

id 107, svdb 2711    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2711  

 

id 181, svdb 2514    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2035 

 

id 182, svdb 2514    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2514 

 

id 183, svdb 2510    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2510 

 

id 184, svdb 2473 

CLOSE 2473,  id 184 requires no further action:

[ Draft8 says

  An associative array type or class shall be illegal as a 

  destination type. So this has already been made illegal.]

   _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2473 

 

id 185, svdb 2342    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2342 

 

id 186, svdb 2288    _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2288 

 

id 192, svdb 1256     _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1256  

 

 

svdb 2719 for the following  ids

id  58  _____ YES   _____ No

id  60  _____ YES   _____ No

id  61  _____ YES   _____ No

id 104  _____ YES   _____ No

id 108  _____ YES   _____ No

id 112  _____ YES   _____ No

id 117  _____ YES   _____ No

id 118  _____ YES   _____ No

id 119  _____ YES   _____ No

id 122  _____ YES   _____ No

id 137  _____ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2719 

 

 

Stu

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Stuart Sutherland

stuart@sutherland-hdl.com

(503) 692-0898

 

 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.