I discussed this issue with Arturo. He feels that the situation in Mantis 2358 should be an error. I have added a proposal to 2358 to make it an error. The proposal is: At the end of section 8.16, Chaining constructors, add the following paragraph: It shall be an error for a derived class to specify the arguments to the base class constructor both when the class is extended and with a super.new(...) call in the constructor. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Apr 26 18:18:40 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 26 2009 - 18:19:25 PDT