[sv-ec] Mantis 2358 - isssue 168

From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog_at_.....>
Date: Sun Apr 26 2009 - 18:17:57 PDT
I discussed this issue with Arturo. He feels that the situation in Mantis 2358 should be an error.

I have added a proposal to 2358 to make it an error. The proposal is:


At the end of section 8.16, Chaining constructors, add the following paragraph:

It shall be an error for a derived class to specify the arguments to the base class constructor both when the class is extended and with a super.new(...) call in the constructor.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Apr 26 18:18:40 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 26 2009 - 18:19:25 PDT