RE: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Fri Apr 24 2009 - 09:35:23 PDT
>From: "Rich, Dave" <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>

>I would really like to make a covergroup output/inout arguments illegal.
>There is no reason to allow these other than sloppiness.

I agree.  They seem to serve no purpose other than potential confusion.


>I would also like to address ballot #110 in the same proposal by
>mentioning that a ref argument is treated as const ref, and that const
>ref only requires type compatibility with wires and variables.

Note that wires cannot be passed by reference.


Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Apr 24 09:36:28 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 24 2009 - 09:37:06 PDT