RE: [sv-ec] ballot issue #107

Hi Dave,
 
This looks fine to me. Do you think we can clarify it further by saying
something like:
"The clocking event can be based on ref arguments of the covergroup."
 
Regds,
Swapnajit


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Scott, David
	Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 4:51 AM
	To: sv-ec@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ec] ballot issue #107
	
	
	This asks the question whether a clocking event could be a ref
argument of a covergroup.
	 
	We think yes, so I've made a proposal for a clarifying sentence
in the discussion of clocking events.  It could be in the immediately
preceding paragraph instead, but I think this is more natural.
	 
	http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2711
	 
	-- David
	 

	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.