[sv-ec] ballot issue #105

Ballot issue #105 reads:

	There is no mention of nets/wires being specified in the
coverage model. Refer last line.

That's entered against 19.2.  The last line includes the phrase
"Associate bins with sets of values, transitions, or cross products".
 
I don't see what's non-trivial about this.  It looks trivial.  In fact,
I think the current wording of the draft standard is just fine.  "Sets
of values" (for coverpoint bins) are specified as expressions, and net
identifiers may be expressions, too.  6.5 and 6.7 are clear enough about
what nets are and how they may be declared with integral data types.
 
I recommend we do nothing about this one.
 
-- David
 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.