RE: [sv-ec] Proposals for ballot comments 35, 46 & 170

From: Stuart Sutherland <stuart_at_.....>
Date: Fri Apr 17 2009 - 08:41:00 PDT
I agree that the additional example requested in ballot comment 35 does not
add any real value to the LRM.  This was discussed in the EC conference
call, and it was decided that adding the 1-line informative comment does no
harm and removes the concern expressed by the balloter.

 

You are correct that the syntax box reference is incorrect.  It is correct
on my notes; I have no clue how my fingers managed to turned "3" into "65"
when I typed it in L.  I will update the proposal with to show the correct
reference number.

 

Stu

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Stuart Sutherland

stuart@sutherland-hdl.com

(503) 692-0898

 

From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:35 PM
To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; SV-EC@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Proposals for ballot comments 35, 46 & 170

 

Hi,

 

I don't understand comment 35 nor the resolution.

What is missing from example s1 that is added by s0?

 

The proposal for Mantis 2696 refers to Syntax 13-65. That should be Syntax
13-3.

 

Shalom

 


  _____  


From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Stuart Sutherland
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:03 AM
To: SV-EC@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] Proposals for ballot comments 35, 46 & 170

I have added proposals to Mantis Item 2705 (ballot comment 35), Mantis 2706
(ballot comment 46) and 2696 (ballot comment 170).  These are no-brainers,
and should be ready for an e-mail vote.

 

Stu

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Apr 17 08:42:11 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 17 2009 - 08:42:47 PDT