Re: [sv-ec] 8.20 missing word

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Mon Jan 05 2009 - 09:48:18 PST
>8.20 of Draft 8-preliminary says in sentence 2,
>
>"For example, a common base class of type BasePacket that sets out the 
>structure of packets but is incomplete would never be constructed."
>
>There needs to be a word between "incomplete" and "would", such as "and".

I think it is correct.  That is the ending of a separate clause.  It might
be clearer as

"For example, a common base class of type BasePacket, that sets out the
structure of packets but is incomplete, would never be constructed."



Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Jan 5 09:48:56 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 05 2009 - 09:49:31 PST