[sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] Editor comments on reviewing draft8-preliminary

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Tue Dec 09 2008 - 07:26:45 PST
In Syntax 5-2 in 5.7, the footnotes need to be superscripts. They turned into non-superscripts. I don't know whether this problem occurs elsewhere as well.

Shalom

Finally, just as an FYI, there is one global change between draft7a and draft8-preliminary which did not get marked with colored text or change bars.  I resequenced the numbering of the footnotes in the Annex A so that the footnotes are in the order of first appearance in the BNF.  All references to footnotes in BNF excerpts that are in the main clauses of the LRM are hyperlinks, and automatically updated to the new footnote numbering.  This change should not require any review by the committees-I just wanted to make sure everyone was aware of the change in case some of you have memorized the old footnote numbering ;)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Dec 9 07:29:37 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 09 2008 - 07:31:19 PST