To indicate the responsibility of the tool, this could maybe be slightly reworded as "The implementation shall preserve object stability when ..." By the way, I think I had this discussion with Stu the previous time the IEEE complained about 'guarantee' and I had the same comment as Gord at that time. Shalom > >> Object stability shall be preserved when object and > thread creation > >> and random number generation are done in the same order > as before > >> > > > > Not having read the text preceding this so it may already be there, > > but these seem to be missing a requirement on what is > preserving the > > order of creation - code or tool. > > Both. Given small "trailing" design perturbations, the tool > is required to preserve stability. The user has the > responsibility for not disturbing the "leading" design > components or behavior. This is implied by the full > discussion in 18.14.1. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Dec 4 20:01:30 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 04 2008 - 20:02:17 PST