I was reading mantis item 1500. It seems that it originally was intended to limit where you could used a datatype which was declared as a forward typedef. My reading of the resolution is that it i snow legal to use the type name of a fwd typdef as the base type of a derived class. I mean that the following is legal. program top_level; typedef class cds_madeup; class cds_callback extends cds_madeup; // legal endclass : cds_callback class cds_madeup; endclass endprogram Can someone confirm my understanding? Francoise ' -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Nov 26 11:59:01 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 26 2008 - 11:59:48 PST