RE: [sv-ec] class construction syntax - new feature proposal

Hi Steven,

Why not just:

	b = C::new();

followig C++ syntax ? 

Regards,
Mirek

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Sharp
Sent: 3 października 2008 18:51
To: sv-ec@server.eda-stds.org; daniel.mlynek@aldec.com
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] class construction syntax - new feature proposal

This comment is a month late, so I have included the original email at the
end for reference.

An alternative syntax would be to use a cast to the desired class type:

	b = C'(new());
	
A cast is equivalent to an assignment to an intermediate variable of the
cast type.  So this would be equivalent to an assignment to an intermediate
variable of type C.  This would indicate that new() should create an object
of type C, since it is assigning to a variable of type C.

It may seem odd to have an assignment that casts to a type other than that
of the LHS.  The cast is the opposite of the actual conversion that is being
done implicitly, from the derived class to the base class.  You could do
that explicitly if it seemed clearer:

	b = B'(C'(new()));



>X-eda.org-MailScanner-Watermark: 
>1221205409.14454@H2k1J8JaWJvPqJ9LlcxJiA
>X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda.org: majordom set sender to
owner-sv-ec@eda.org using -f
>X-eda.org-MailScanner-Watermark: 1221205367.5615@8X9B9lMwFlqKcS4vslDfaQ
>From: "Daniel Mlynek" <daniel.mlynek@aldec.com>
>To: <sv-ec@eda-stds.org>
>Subject: [sv-ec] class construction syntax - new feature proposal
>Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:42:44 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
>Thread-Index: AckPKvviIvjumlokQL6tdxj9ARI53w==
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2008 07:42:44.0842 (UTC)
FILETIME=[FC0B6CA0:01C90F2A]
>X-eda.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
>X-Spam-Status: No, No
>X-eda.org-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
>information
>X-MailScanner-ID: m857hPq5003715
>X-eda.org-MailScanner-From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org
>X-pstn-neptune: 8/1/0.12/25
>X-pstn-levels: (S:60.82089/99.90000 CV:99.9999 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 
>M:97.0282
C:98.6951 )
>X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.0000:1.0000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
>X-pstn-addresses: from <daniel.mlynek@aldec.com> [145/6]
>X-Received: By mx-sanjose2.Cadence.COM as m857jO52026332 at Fri Sep  5 
>00:45:24
2008
>
>There is one annoying thing in object contruction syntax in SV - there 
>is no neat and nice way to create an object of user choosen type and 
>assign it to handle of different (compatybile type) - consider:
> 
>class B;
>endclass
>class C extends B;
>endclass
> 
>C c;
>B b;
> 
>initial begin
>    c=new;
>    b=c; //I have to write 2 lines of code to create and assign object 
>of child type to handle of base type //my proposal is to accept syntax: 
>new <class_type_identifier> - which always creates an object of pointed 
>type and returns handle to it
>    b = new C;
>end
> 
>I haven't found mantis on it and I cannot see any obsticles to add it 
>to LRM.  I've think that this is very usefull - so please consider 
>adding such feature.
> 
> 
>DANiel
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
>MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.