Please note the following excerpt from P1800-2009, draft6: "The get_coverage() method returns the cumulative (or type) coverage, which considers the contribution of all instances of a particular coverage item; and it is a static method that is available on both types (via the :: operator) and instances (using the . operator). In contrast, the get_inst_coverage() method returns the coverage of the specific instance on which it is invoked; thus, it can only be invoked via the . operator." The above para mentions that get_coverage() can be used with covergroup instance also. So, in the following example, would both get_coverage() and get_inst_coverage() report same numbers? If they are same, what is the justification of allowing get_coverage() for instances? cg cgi = new; cgi.get_coverage(); cgi.get_inst_coverage(); Thx, Swapnajit -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Sep 1 04:03:33 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 04:03:43 PDT