RE: [sv-ec] Fixed sized bin distribution Mantis 2055

After it failed an email vote, it was discussed in Oct 29, 2007 SV-EC
meeting. The minutes show this:

     2055   Arturo, David Scott

	  David - it wasn't unclear in the existing spec.
		    - an arbitrary change
		    - not backwards compatible
      Mike  - this is a nicer approach, but it is not backward
compatible
	  Gord  - prefers to leave it alone unless there is a good
reason to change it. 
      Arturo - suggested that this new dist be an enhancement and that 
		      we leave the default behavior alone. 
		    - most people use the autobin capability 
      Stu  - doesn't think it is a cornercase
		- wait for a new proposal that doesn't create backward 
		  compatibility issues.
		- could possible use one of the type options to handle
it. 

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swapnajit Chakraborti [mailto:swapnaj@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:09 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom; Saurabh Sharma; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Fixed sized bin distribution Mantis 2055
> 
> Hi Shalom,
> 
> The status of this mantis doesn't reflect that it is 
> rejected. When was this decision taken?
> 
> Regds,
> Swapnajit. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 2:49 PM
> To: Saurabh Sharma; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Fixed sized bin distribution Mantis 2055
> 
> Hi, Saurabh.
> 
> I am the filed the Mantis issue 2055 and the proposal.
> 
> SV-EC rejected the proposal because it would not be backwards 
> compatible with IEEE Std 1800-2005. 
> 
> Regards,
> Shalom
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org
> > [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Sharma
> > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 12:08 PM
> > To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-ec] Fixed sized bin distribution Mantis 2055
> > 
> > Hi
> > 
> > Earlier it was discussed that bin distribution with in a 
> fixed sized 
> > bin of a coverpoint will be as even as possible.
> > 
> > On this issue  Mantis 2055 was filed which 
> required/suggested  changes
> 
> > in P1800-2008/D3a, 18.5.2 section.
> > 
> > But in the sixth draft of the P1800 system verilog LRM 
> these changes 
> > have not been reflected.
> > 
> > Please let me know when should we expect the changes to be 
> reflected 
> > in the LRM.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Saurabh
> > 
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> > MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential 
> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any 
> review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender 
> and delete all copies.
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.