Re: [sv-ec] Review of 2038/1900

From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik_at_.....>
Date: Mon Jul 07 2008 - 14:29:32 PDT

Hi Gord,

 > 2038 (concurrent assertion scheduling, etc) looks pretty good to
 > me.  I have no current issues with it.


Are you referring to 2398 here?

I also suspect that you didn't copy the alias that you intended
to copy (sv-sc versus sv-ec).

Neil





-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Mon Jul 7 14:30:14 2008

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Neil Korpusik: "Re: [sv-ec] Typo in coverage section of Draft 6"
Previous message: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "[sv-ec] Review of 2038/1900"
In reply to: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "[sv-ec] Review of 2038/1900"
Next in thread: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-ec] Review of 2038/1900"
Reply: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-ec] Review of 2038/1900"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 07 2008 - 14:30:40 PDT