Hi Mirek, I tried to address some of your questions in my previous mail. To introduce random simulation semantics for free variables and even to recycle the existing syntax may be possible though not very straightforward. We can work on it, and specific suggestions are welcome. Thanks, Dmitry ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Mirek Forczek Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 2:50 PM To: sv-ec@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ec] 1900 mantis (checkers): free checker variables - debugging issue The proposal introduces "free checker variables" that are about to be "non-deterministic". Hopefully the "non-deterministic" property do not deny the sequence of free checker variable values to be repeatable in simulation. A similar issue exists for "random" variables - there is a "seed" mechanism that you can use to get the pseudo-random sequence fixed in simluation. I did not noticed a similar mechanism for "free checker variables" in a proposal text. I think this is a vital issue for a users, to make the models debugging possible and effective. Regards, Mirek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 9 06:52:01 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 06:52:44 PDT