RE: [sv-ec] 1900 mantis (checkers): final (final_check ?) in checker ?

But I see now: there is 2089 mantis that address exactly this issue and it
has 'resolved' status.
 
And at the same time it is on a list for discussion by a new P1800 comittee
...
 
Mirek

  _____  

From: Korchemny, Dmitry [mailto:dmitry.korchemny@intel.com] 
Sent: 7 kwietnia 2008 12:28
To: Mirek Forczek; sv-ec@server.eda.org
Cc: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] 1900 mantis (checkers): final (final_check ?) in
checker ?



Hi Mirek,

 

There is no apparent need in final_check, since concurrent assertions cannot
be put in final procedures, and the only goal of the ._check procedures is
to provide specific clock inference rules for concurrent assertions.

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

 

  _____  

From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Mirek Forczek
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 1:21 PM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] 1900 mantis (checkers): final (final_check ?) in checker ?

 

Hi,

 

In "16.18.5 Checker procedures" section of the proposal there is:

"The following procedures are allowed inside a checker body:
- initial_check procedure, and
- always_check procedure"

Anybody wondered about having final (final_check ?) procedure too ?

 

Regards,

Mirek

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Intel Israel (74) Limited



This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for

the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution

by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended

recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.