Ray, Thanks. My mistake on merging the two constructs. I guess I should do this earlier (when my eyes are actually open :) Then I will change my vote to yes: 2183 _X__ Yes ___ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2183 Arturo -----Original Message----- From: Ryan, Ray [mailto:Ray_Ryan@mentor.com] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:37 AM To: Arturo Salz; Mehdi Mohtashemi; sv-ec@eda.org Subject: RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Ballot: Closes 11:59pm PDT, Friday, March 28 2008 Arturo, I copied the new production "solve_before_primary" from the select alternative for "primary". 1) There isn't a reference to "hierarchical_identifer_select", rather there are references to "hierarchical_identifier" and "select". 2) I have removed the "package_scope" reference. The updated proposal is 'errata_2183f'. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Arturo Salz > Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:12 AM > To: Mehdi Mohtashemi; sv-ec@server.eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Ballot: Closes 11:59pm PDT, > Friday, March 28 2008 > > > 2183 ___ Yes _X__ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2183 > > > I couldn't find the production hierarchical_identifier_select. > The package scope should be removed from the production. > > I'll change my vote to yes if these two points are addressed. > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous > content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Mar 28 09:46:41 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 28 2008 - 09:47:06 PDT