Forwarding back to the reflector. David Scott wrote: > Too late, I expect, for SystemVerilog 2008, we've found some serious > issues that arose from our consideration of Mantis 1897 > (http://eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1897) -- now completely approved by > SV-EC and the Champions. > > Here they are: > > * The versions of get_coverage with optional "ref" arguments can't > (or shouldn't) quite work as currently described: > http://eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2242 > * My interpretation of covergroup option.per_instance leads me to > think that post-process coverage merging would be crippled by > default if tools actually implemented the standard: > http://eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2243 > * Coverage database behavior implied by the standard is relatively > ill-defined, leaving a bunch of questions unanswered, I think: > http://eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2244 > > -- David Scott, Mentor Graphics > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 4 11:18:18 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 04 2008 - 11:20:03 PST