Hi Jonathan, I'd prefer the comments in the example to be fixed as well. However, I'm not saying that I think you need to do more updates to 1702; 1702 as-is has already been passed, and is just fine. I just think this mantis should remain open as an errata to be addressed. --Mike Jonathan Bromley wrote: > Michael, > > >>> 520 ___ Yes _x__ No >>> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000520 >>> >>> >> The comments in the example code of 7.11.1 "Queue operators" >> should be >> changed to not explain the operations in terms of append, prepend, >> insert and delete since these operations have different >> semantics w.r.t. outdating of references. >> > > I think you;ll find this has already been done - halfway down > page 2 of the current proposal 1702-2. I felt it was adequate > simply to delete the statements of equivalence. > > Let me know if that doesn't answer your concern. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Dec 15 02:36:46 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Dec 15 2007 - 02:37:38 PST