I have uploaded my proposal for the inline constraint resolution. If Arturo uploads a "local::" proposal at some point, I'd be willing to normalize them. Note that I rewrote the resolution rules to more clearly express the intent that all normal resolution rules apply if the name does not exist in the randomize...with class object. Arturo, feel free to use that language or propose something else, but I think that the current description of how the outer scopes are handled is incomplete at best. My proposal is 1858-randomize_with_syntax.htm attached to Mantis 1858. As a side note, the "inline_constraint_declaration" production does not exist in the Annex A grammar. I didn't attach a proposal to fix that since I don't have the time at this point to rummage through the grammar to determine how to fix things. Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Dec 12 22:00:53 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 12 2007 - 22:01:21 PST