Hi All, There were 4 mantis items that are assigned to the sv-bc that ended up on the list of mantis items that the sv-ec wanted to close on for the 2008 LRM. I went through the full list yesterday in an effort to help Mehdi prepare for the 3-day email vote. 1809 accidentally got misfiled with those Mantis items that are covered by the proposal for 1702. The sv-bc is currently voting on a proposal for 1809. I will be voting no on 1809 in the sv-ec email vote so that we don't end up with a problem of having two committees voting on the same proposal at the same time. It only takes one no-vote to stop an email vote and force it to be discussed in the next meeting. Neil Jonathan Bromley wrote: > Shalom, > >> I don't understand. >> How can sv-ec close 1809? It's an sv-BC issue! > > I think this should probably be 974 instead of 1809. > 974 was the highest-numbered item on my original > hit-list. All the items in question are now marked > as children of, and should have been completely > covered by, 1702. > > 1809 is squarely in name-resolution land. If I've > ever suggested that 1702 affects it, I apologise: > plainly they're not related. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Dec 12 13:56:20 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 12 2007 - 13:56:33 PST