Re: [sv-ec] parameterized class "::" operations and out-of-block declarations

From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv_at_.....>
Date: Mon Nov 19 2007 - 10:59:01 PST
Mark Hartoog wrote:
> I think this looks good. The only comment I have is the second sentence
> in the second paragraph of the 8.23 changes reads 
> 
> "The return type of an out-of-block declaration shall be specified 
> prior to the out-of-block indication for the method."
> 
> I know what you are trying to say, but it seems confusing the way 
> it is worded.

Yes, I struggled with that a bit.  I think that the change to
"shall" from the original "must" actually made this a bit worse.

Perhaps it would be better to just drop the sentence.

Gord.


> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On 
>> Behalf Of Gordon Vreugdenhil
>> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 2:15 PM
>> To: SV_EC List
>> Subject: [sv-ec] parameterized class "::" operations and 
>> out-of-block declarations
>>
>> I've uploaded a proposal for Mantis 1857 that I believe 
>> captures the agreed upon behaviors from the last name 
>> resolution meeting.
>> Please review asap and let me know if there are any 
>> substantive problems.
>>
>> Gord.
>> --
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
>> Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Nov 19 11:06:00 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 11:06:28 PST