Hi Gord, I am having trouble understanding one aspect of your example (the use of the typedef). In the new proposed text there is the following statement. References to the default specialized type must use the explicit specialization form "#( )" with no actuals. But then in the example you are using a typedef which does not use "#()". The comment says that the typedef defines T to be the default specialization. I am having a problem seeing how this is so. Example: class C #(int p = 1); static task t; int p; int x = C::p; // C::p disambiguates p // C::p is not p in the default specialization endtask endclass int x = C::p; // illegal int y = C#()::p; // legal; refers to parameter p in default // specialization of C typedef C T; --> int z = T::p; // legal; the typedef defines T to be the default // specialization so T::p refers to the p in the // default specialization Neil Gordon Vreugdenhil wrote On 11/16/07 02:14 PM,: > I've uploaded a proposal for Mantis 1857 that I believe captures > the agreed upon behaviors from the last name resolution meeting. > Please review asap and let me know if there are any substantive > problems. > > Gord. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Nov 16 15:50:13 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 15:50:34 PST