> I just noticed an example in the section on set membership that > initializes a queue with an assignment pattern. > > int array [$] = '{3, 4, 5}; Thanks. I'd missed that. I find myself rapidly shifting to a position that says: any expression that yields an unpacked array value should be OK for assignment to *any* unpacked array, be it queue, dynamic or fixed-size - provided the size is correct for fixed-size, of course. I've tried hard to find reasons why this might be ambiguous, or otherwise a bad idea, and so far I've failed. Can anyone see an objection that I've missed? There are a LOT of places in the LRM where kinds of unpacked array are described in a manner that's incomplete, ambiguous or otherwise misleading.... I'll try to create a real proposal, addressing all that I've found, over the weekend. -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Nov 16 13:54:07 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:54:40 PST