RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 26th 2007

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Fri Oct 26 2007 - 08:14:03 PDT
>From: "Stuart Sutherland" <stuart@sutherland-hdl.com>

>>  1715  ___ Yes   _X_ No  
>>  http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001715  
>I vote no for two reasons.  
>1) There have been issues raised by other voters that need to be resolved.
>2) 1800 14.10 shows an example of @(dram) and says it is equivalent to
>@(posedge phi1).  Using this same clocking example, the proposed use of
>wait(dram) implies that it is equivalent to wait(posedge phi1), which I
>consider to an undesirable change to the wait construct.

I didn't see anything in the proposal that suggested you could do
wait(dram).  It talked about wait(dram.triggered).

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Oct 26 08:14:21 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 26 2007 - 08:14:55 PDT